Changes in labor law in our country to continue and continue in force, have slipped to the judgments and case law to decide finally on the application of the rules, because even the existence of an operator in principle pro distorted immoral constitution of 1993, the trend is reversed and thus began to appear a code of labor court decisions favorable to employers and groups of power and even contrary to law, issued by judges largely satisfied with their jurisdictional power and aware of the time of being installed within a system which also are an important part.
The proceeds of the judiciary and professionals called to justice in the country reminds us of the following paragraphs:
"Since April 5, 1992, date of the coup State Fujimori in Peru, began to intensify the flexibility of labor laws at the hands of some lawyers and other professionals dedicated to advising businesses, operating from state bodies which have joined. Therefore, pro-business doctrine justifying the flexibility was welcomed as a unique and exclusive character, in social media, by certain employers. Feeling free to do what they want and come in their last volatilized and repairs, these professionals took to recommend to the sponsors, both private and public, in exchange for substantial fees of course, the subjugation of workers a lease of services being the ratio of labor nature, the imposition of work unpaid overtime, doing away with the controls ingress and egress of the worker, the use of contract arrangements for the exercise of activities which by their nature are permanent reduction in wages with the threat of dismissal, wrongful dismissal, the dismissal of union workers, etc.., attitudes welcomed as valid by most judges. That is, the doctrine, or better put, his doctrine was for these professionals as a springboard from which they would dive, disdainful, haughty, smiling, into the den of immorality. "
LABOR LAW
JORGE VASQUEZ RENDÓN
General Theory 2nd Edition 2007
0 comments:
Post a Comment